Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(6)2022 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1869883

ABSTRACT

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are reluctant to participate in the influenza vaccination program, despite their high risk to contract and diffuse influenza due to professional exposure. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic could raise HCW flu vaccination adherence. The aim of this study was to assess HCW attitudes toward influenza vaccination in the COVID-19 era. A multicenter observational study was carried out in three Italian hospitals (two in Pesaro and one in Fano, Marche region, Italy). Data about HCW influenza vaccination between 2013 and 2021 were extracted from the vaccination registers. An online questionnaire was sent to HCWs from July to October 2020 to assess their opinion about influenza vaccination in terms of knowledge, attitude, and practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of flu-vaccinated HCWs increased from 3.7% in the 2013-2014 flu season to 53.6% in the 2020-2021 flu season (p < 0.001). About 15% (n = 324) of HCWs responded to the online questionnaire, and 30.5% of them declared that they had changed their minds on flu vaccination after the COVID-19 pandemic, deciding to get vaccinated. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased HCWs' attitudes toward flu vaccination. However, flu vaccination adherence remained low and should be improved.

2.
Front Oncol ; 11: 737300, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1436016

ABSTRACT

The efficacy of Covid-19 vaccine in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients is still unknown. We planned a prospective study to evaluate the immune response after the administration of Covid-19 vaccine in HSCT recipients. Fifty patients previously submitted to HSCT (38 autologous and 12 allogeneic) received the mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech). Serum samples of all patients were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG against the Spike glycoprotein, 30 days after the second dose of vaccine. Antibody response was compared to a control group of 45 healthy subjects. Of the 50 patients tested, 12 did not develop any antibody response, including 6 patients undergoing autologous (16%) and 6 allogeneic HSCT (50%). Cyclosporine administration in allogeneic recipients and prior administration of Rituximab in the autologous setting correlated with lower antibody titers (p < 0.0003 and p=0.000, respectively). Flow cytometry of peripheral blood samples, performed 30 days after the vaccination, showed a significant correlation between the antibody response to Sars-COV2 and an increased number in CD19+ B lymphocytes (p = 0.0003) and CD56+ natural killer (NK) cells (p = 0.00). In conclusion, prior Rituximab before autologous HSCT and cyclosporine administration after allogeneic HSCT negatively affected the antibody response to Sars-COV2 vaccine, possibly due to their immunosuppressive action on CD20 +B cells and T cells, respectively. The correlation between seroconversion to Sars-COV2 and higher number of CD19 + B cells and CD56+ NK cells, suggests a central role for B and NK cells in the development of COVID-19 immunity after vaccination with a mRNA-based platform.

3.
Life (Basel) ; 11(7)2021 Jul 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1302363

ABSTRACT

Background. Health and social management of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, responsible for the COVID-19 disease, requires both screening tools and diagnostic procedures. Reliable screening tests aim at identifying (truely) infectious individuals that can spread the viral infection and therefore are essential for tracing and harnessing the epidemic diffusion. Instead, diagnostic tests should supplement clinical and radiological findings, thus helping in establishing the diagnosis. Several analytical assays, mostly using RT-PCR-based technologies, have become commercially available for healthcare workers and clinical laboratories. However, such tests showed some critical limitations, given that a relevant number of both false-positive and false-negative cases have been so far reported. Moreover, those analytical techniques demonstrated to be significantly influenced by pre-analytical biases, while the sensitivity showed a dramatic time dependency. Aim. Herein, we critically investigate limits and perspectives of currently available RT-PCR techniques, especially when referring to the required performances in providing reliable epidemiological and clinical information. Key Concepts. Current data cast doubt on the use of RT-PCR swabs as a screening procedure for tracing the evolution of the current SARS-COV-2 pandemic. Indeed, the huge number of both false-positive and false-negative results deprives the trustworthiness of decision making based on those data. Therefore, we should refine current available analytical tests to quickly identify individuals able to really transmit the virus, with the aim to control and prevent large outbreaks.

4.
J Am Coll Surg ; 231(2):299-300, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-704942
5.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 164(1): 82-86, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-646277

ABSTRACT

While olfactory dysfunction associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has attracted considerable interest, few studies have tracked outcomes at serial time points or beyond 2 weeks. Furthermore, data are conflicting regarding whether COVID-19 severity correlates with degree of olfactory dysfunction. This prospective case-control study analyzed prevalence and severity of subjective loss of smell in outpatients (n = 23) and inpatients (n = 20) with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection vs healthy controls (n = 25). Olfactory dysfunction was reported more commonly in COVID-19 patients than in healthy controls (P < .001), and outpatients paradoxically reported loss of smell more commonly than inpatients (P = .02). Headaches were present in 52% of patients with olfactory dysfunction. Anosmia or hyposmia persisted beyond 5 days but most of the patients recovered by 30 days, suggesting favorable prognosis for olfaction. Differences between inpatients and outpatients are potentially reflective of timeline of olfactory symptoms and contextual factors, underscoring the importance of corroborative objective testing, coupled with careful tracking of temporal relationships.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Olfaction Disorders/epidemiology , Recovery of Function , SARS-CoV-2 , Smell/physiology , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Olfaction Disorders/etiology , Olfaction Disorders/physiopathology , Prevalence , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
6.
Respir Med Case Rep ; 31: 101115, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-628342

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a pandemic, threatening global public health. In the current paper, we describe our successful treatment of one COVID-19 pneumonia patient case with high mortality risk factors. Our experience underlines the importance of the use of a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach in order to achieve a favorable clinical outcome. Further, enhancing the capability of the COVID-19 diagnosis with the use of the chest imaging modalities is discussed.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL